Players

Adriel Schaefer 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	13	16	13	11

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	18	3.60	5	27	.481	7	1	5	0.20	16	.688	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	8.36
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	19	.263	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.55
5	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	15	.267	7	3	1	1.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.87
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	16	.313	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.12
12	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	21	.286	11	1	1	0.33	16	.938	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.05
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	13	.692	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.24
18	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	20	5.00	5	27	.556	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	24.5	9.02
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	15	.400	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	2	.000	10.0	7.50
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	2	27	.519	8	2	3	0.40	17	.824	.	.	.	.	19.0	5.98
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	3	27	.667	11	2	3	0.40	23	.870	.	.	.	.	26.0	7.80
25	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	6	33	.333	6	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	21.5	8.08
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	18	.444	5	0	4	0.00	17	.765	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.10
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	26	.385	3	2	2	0.50	12	.833	.	.	.	.	18.5	6.45
32	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	0	0.00	4	.000	12.5	6.81
35	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	4	28	.393	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.87
37	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	22	.182	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	10.5	6.42
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	6	27	.296	8	3	4	0.60	21	.810	2	0.40	1	2.000	19.0	6.13
Total		64	220	3.44	64	374	.417	98	19	35	0.30	240	.854	4	0.06	9	.444	274.0	7.08

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	8	1.60	18	2.44	25	3	.880	21.0	8.36
4	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	7	8	0	2.00	4	1.00	11	2.48	21	0	1.000	14.5	6.55
5	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	9	2.25	20	1	.950	12.5	6.87
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	10	2.10	21	1	.952	8.0	5.12
12	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	14	2.36	22	2	.909	12.5	8.05
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	4	2.57	7	0	1.000	14.0	9.24
18	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	10	2.50	15	2.26	27	3	.889	24.5	9.02
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	8	2.50	14	0	1.000	10.0	7.50
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	18	1.97	37	7	.811	19.0	5.98
23	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	6	1.20	11	1.96	28	4	.857	26.0	7.80
25	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	5	1.25	12	2.00	28	4	.857	21.5	8.08
27	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	11	1.64	36	7	.806	12.5	4.10
30	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	9	2.09	22	1	.955	18.5	6.45
32	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	4	1.83	12	1	.917	12.5	6.81
35	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	15	2.00	31	5	.839	17.5	7.87
37	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	15	2.21	29	2	.931	10.5	6.42
40	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	20	2.15	40	4	.900	19.0	6.13
Total		64	3	64	67	3	1.05	78	1.22	204	2.12	420	45	.893	274.0	7.08