Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	6	1.50	4	1.500	0.0	5.76
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	7.58
7	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	13	.923	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	6.88
12	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	2	0.67	12	.167	0.0	6.00
18	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.50	16	.938	7	1.75	4	1.750	2.0	5.04
29	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	4	1.00	8	.500	1.0	4.75
Total		21	.	.	.	.	.	28	3	12	0.14	70	.829	26	1.24	42	.619	3.0	6.00

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	6	2.00	16	1	.938	0.0	5.76
5	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	2.36	11	0	1.000	0.0	7.58
7	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	18	2.32	31	1	.968	0.0	6.88
12	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.21	14	1	.929	0.0	6.00
18	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	8	1.79	28	3	.893	2.0	5.04
29	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	7	2.00	19	1	.947	1.0	4.75
Total		21	.	.	.	.	.	43	2.05	51	2.09	119	7	.941	3.0	6.00