Players

Oliver Klein 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	12	16	11	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	20	.050	6	2	3	0.50	15	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.0	4.64
3	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	21	.429	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	7.16
4	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	11	53	.170	2	1	2	0.20	12	.833	.	.	.	.	21.0	5.77
6	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	35	.400	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.91
7	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	26	.038	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	4.97
8	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	24	.250	9	1	2	0.33	16	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	8.03
9	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	8	36	.194	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.76
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	19	.263	3	2	1	0.50	14	.929	.	.	.	.	10.5	3.91
12	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	20	.350	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	0	0.00	2	.000	12.5	6.33
14	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	7	36	.333	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.91
15	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	32	.438	2	0	2	0.00	16	.875	0	0.00	2	.000	18.0	6.22
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	10	.300	6	1	3	0.25	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	3.78
18	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	6	27	.259	6	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.87
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	22	4.40	8	39	.359	12	2	4	0.40	20	.800	1	0.20	1	1.000	24.0	7.20
22	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	20	.200	10	0	2	0.00	21	.905	1	0.20	1	1.000	10.0	3.06
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	4	26	.538	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	0	0.00	2	.000	21.0	6.74
31	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	31	.516	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	21.0	6.96
34	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	26	.385	10	2	1	0.50	19	.947	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.29
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	8	20	.150	8	1	1	0.33	15	.933	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	6.66
Total		79	256	3.24	100	521	.299	103	15	36	0.19	275	.869	7	0.09	15	.467	291.5	6.17

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	11	2.44	16	0	1.000	9.0	4.64
3	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	2.11	19	2	.895	13.0	7.16
4	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	13	1.88	40	2	.950	21.0	5.77
6	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	11	2.00	29	4	.862	20.5	7.91
7	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.00	22	0	1.000	9.0	4.97
8	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	11	3.67	11	1.97	29	3	.897	13.5	8.03
9	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	2.03	34	3	.912	15.0	5.76
10	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	17	2.21	33	2	.939	10.5	3.91
12	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	6	1.50	11	2.24	21	0	1.000	12.5	6.33
14	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	18	2.29	31	3	.903	20.0	7.91
15	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	12	2.40	10	2.04	24	3	.875	18.0	6.22
17	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	17	2.15	27	6	.778	7.0	3.78
18	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	19	2.22	36	3	.917	16.0	5.87
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	16	2.03	34	4	.882	24.0	7.20
22	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	12	1.77	30	5	.833	10.0	3.06
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	12	1.90	31	2	.935	21.0	6.74
31	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	8	1.60	10	2.00	26	3	.885	21.0	6.96
34	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	15	2.33	27	1	.963	18.5	8.29
39	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.00	22	3	.864	12.0	6.66
Total		79	2	37	39	3	0.49	100	1.27	246	2.07	531	49	.908	291.5	6.17