Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	3	0.75	9	.333	1.0	5.75
8	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	6.26
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	4	.500	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	7.00
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	2.80
Total		13	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	2	0.15	29	.931	8	0.62	23	.348	2.0	5.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	2.11	19	2	.895	1.0	5.75
8	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.18	28	2	.929	1.0	6.26
10	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	12	2.04	23	3	.870	0.0	7.00
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	1.89	35	1	.971	0.0	2.80
Total		13	.	.	.	.	.	26	2.00	48	2.04	105	8	.924	2.0	5.45