Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	12	.167	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.05
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.22
7	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	10	-.300	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.61
10	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	17	.000	5	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.22
13	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	22	.227	9	1	5	0.25	19	.737	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.99
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	13	.231	4	1	5	0.33	12	.583	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.08
17	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	18	.000	6	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.21
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	15	.200	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.70
26	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	18	.000	4	1	5	0.25	13	.615	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.00
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	19	.053	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.08
Total		37	48	1.30	37	149	.074	47	7	29	0.19	131	.779	.	.	.	.	67.5	5.32

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.05
4	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.22
7	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.61
10	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.22
13	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.99
14	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.08
17	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.21
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.70
26	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.00
29	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.08
Total		37	2	21	23	3	0.62	31	0.84	.	.	.	.	.	67.5	5.32