Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	8	.000	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	29	9.67	78	.372	2.5	4.30
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	3	0	3	0.00	14	.786	27	6.75	73	.370	3.5	3.70
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	2	-1.000	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	28	9.33	65	.431	1.0	3.80
12	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	22	7.33	56	.393	1.0	2.06
15	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	16	1	3	0.25	26	.885	47	11.75	88	.534	4.0	7.86
17	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	47	11.75	83	.566	0.5	6.22
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	7	-.143	5	2	3	0.50	17	.824	40	10.00	91	.440	4.5	4.98
34	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	1	.000	7	3	2	0.75	18	.889	50	12.50	92	.543	3.5	7.59
36	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	42	14.00	73	.575	2.5	8.74
39	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	37	12.33	69	.536	2.0	7.02
Total		35	4	0.11	7	40	-.075	52	12	20	0.34	146	.863	369	10.54	768	.480	25.0	5.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.30
6	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.70
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.80
12	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.06
15	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.86
17	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	6.22
29	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.98
34	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.59
36	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.74
39	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.02
Total		35	2	14	16	5	0.46	27	0.77	.	.	.	.	.	25.0	5.63