Players

William Jones 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	15	13	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.46
3	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	10	.400	4	2	3	0.50	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.77
4	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	10	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
6	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	20	.600	7	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.51
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
9	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	13	.308	11	3	1	1.00	19	.947	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.47
11	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	11	.636	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.18
12	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.29
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	1	20	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.76
15	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	14	.071	2	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.01
18	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	7	18	.222	5	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.11
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
26	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	7	.714	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.14
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
34	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	0	18	.611	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.46
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	10	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.88
46	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.63
Total		60	127	2.12	39	209	.421	40	8	14	0.13	103	.864	.	.	.	.	158.0	5.44

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.46
3	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.77
4	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.36
6	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.51
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
9	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.47
11	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.18
12	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.29
13	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.76
15	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.01
18	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.11
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
26	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.14
31	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
34	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.46
39	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.88
46	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.63
Total		60	4	38	42	8	0.70	24	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	158.0	5.44