Players

Lucas Moore 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	12	12	12	11	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	6	24	-.042	8	2	0	0.40	19	1.000	0	0.00	3	.000	10.5	4.73
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	26	.077	14	3	0	0.75	20	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	4.74
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	18	-.111	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.19
7	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	22	.409	6	1	5	0.25	14	.643	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.55
9	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	4	28	.214	2	1	3	0.20	12	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	4.53
10	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	5	23	.304	9	0	3	0.00	20	.850	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.19
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	19	.053	7	1	3	0.33	13	.769	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.05
13	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	6	25	.080	9	3	4	0.75	19	.789	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	4.31
14	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	22	.091	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.68
17	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	24	.250	10	1	2	0.25	19	.895	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	5.20
19	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	14	-.143	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.41
22	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	40	.300	4	0	4	0.00	14	.714	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.30
26	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	12	.000	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.40
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	37	.162	5	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.67
33	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	23	.174	7	2	1	0.40	15	.933	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.74
36	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	24	.083	3	2	3	0.67	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	4.95
39	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	9	25	.120	3	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	4.81
46	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	19	.000	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.84
Total		69	146	2.12	89	425	.134	101	19	38	0.28	242	.843	1	0.01	9	.111	196.0	5.13

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	6	1.20	17	2.19	32	2	.938	10.5	4.73
4	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	17	2.08	38	6	.842	12.0	4.74
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	11	2.23	22	1	.955	5.5	5.19
7	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	12	1.93	30	4	.867	16.5	6.55
9	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	7	1.40	19	2.32	31	2	.935	13.0	4.53
10	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	8	1.60	14	2.10	39	1	.974	12.5	5.19
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.12	26	3	.885	7.0	4.05
13	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	7	1.75	10	2.00	28	2	.929	11.5	4.31
14	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	9	2.20	15	2	.867	10.0	5.68
17	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	10	10	0	2.50	8	2.00	15	1.97	35	3	.914	14.0	5.20
19	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	12	2.50	16	1	.938	4.5	4.41
22	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	9	2.25	17	2.17	36	2	.944	15.5	7.30
26	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	9	1.94	18	3	.833	4.5	3.40
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	17	2.43	28	1	.964	15.0	7.67
33	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	8	1.60	14	2.03	31	4	.871	14.0	4.74
36	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	13	2.07	27	3	.889	9.5	4.95
39	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	7	1.62	26	4	.846	14.5	4.81
46	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	11	2.27	22	0	1.000	6.0	4.84
Total		69	2	58	60	4	0.87	96	1.39	238	2.11	500	44	.912	196.0	5.13