Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	2	0.67	9	.222	1.0	9.29
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	2	0.40	19	.895	2	0.40	14	.143	2.0	9.04
8	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	8.61
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	15	.733	8	1.60	16	.500	0.0	9.93
Total		17	.	.	.	.	.	22	3	8	0.18	61	.869	15	0.88	46	.326	3.0	9.22

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	1.0	9.29
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	17	2.59	22	0	1.000	2.0	9.04
8	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.68	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.61
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	15	2.59	22	0	1.000	0.0	9.93
Total		17	.	.	.	.	.	47	2.76	55	2.64	74	0	1.000	3.0	9.22