Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	14	-.143	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.97
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	8	.125	3	2	0	0.67	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.20
9	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	11	-.182	0	0	3	0.00	5	.400	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.88
10	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	11	.182	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.72
15	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	24	.042	2	1	2	0.25	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.88
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	11	16	-.563	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.82
29	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	10	.300	7	1	3	0.25	17	.824	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.17
35	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	9	.333	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.22
39	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	11	-.364	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.41
Total		30	29	0.97	36	114	-.061	20	4	18	0.13	83	.783	.	.	.	.	40.5	4.36

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.97
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.20
9	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.88
10	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.72
15	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.88
17	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.82
29	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.17
35	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.22
39	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.41
Total		30	1	13	14	1	0.47	38	1.27	.	.	.	.	.	40.5	4.36