Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	10	3	2	0.60	19	.895	55	11.00	106	.519	4.0	5.58
4	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	3	.000	14	1	3	0.20	24	.875	60	12.00	117	.513	2.5	7.82
6	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	38	12.67	69	.551	3.5	7.98
8	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	8	.250	7	2	3	0.40	20	.850	52	10.40	107	.486	6.0	6.42
9	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	6	0	2	0.00	17	.882	44	11.00	96	.458	5.0	6.62
10	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	7	1	1	0.20	20	.950	57	11.40	103	.553	3.5	6.18
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	8	2	3	0.67	17	.824	40	13.33	60	.667	3.5	9.10
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	2	0	3	0.00	14	.786	43	10.75	85	.506	3.5	5.68
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	1	5	0.33	12	.583	22	7.33	55	.400	3.5	3.86
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	11	5	2	1.25	22	.909	35	8.75	83	.422	6.0	4.84
19	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	6	1	5	0.20	20	.750	63	12.60	113	.558	2.0	7.16
21	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	16	2	5	0.50	26	.808	53	13.25	86	.616	6.0	9.87
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	13	3	2	1.00	20	.900	29	9.67	64	.453	6.5	7.27
25	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	10	5	2	1.67	18	.889	37	12.33	53	.698	6.0	8.31
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	31	10.33	71	.437	0.0	4.86
30	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	5	.400	7	1	3	0.20	21	.857	57	11.40	107	.533	4.5	6.70
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	38	12.67	64	.594	0.0	6.86
38	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	7	1	6	0.20	21	.714	57	11.40	112	.509	1.5	6.02
Total		72	19	0.26	7	72	.167	138	28	52	0.39	324	.840	811	11.26	1551	.523	67.5	6.73

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.58
4	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.82
6	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.98
8	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.42
9	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.62
10	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.18
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.10
13	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.68
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.86
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.84
19	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.16
21	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.87
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.27
25	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.31
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.86
30	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.70
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.86
38	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.02
Total		72	6	29	35	0	0.49	66	0.92	.	.	.	.	.	67.5	6.73