Players

Leonardo Diaz 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	16	16	12	-

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
237 55th	.550 13th	9 244th	34 303rd	88 19th

Career Honors

S61st All-PAC-8

S73rd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	18	.444	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.08
2	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	13	.308	10	1	6	0.25	20	.700	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.10
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	16	.000	4	1	4	0.33	10	.600	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.94
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	20	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.28
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.10
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	10	.900	3	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.23
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	14	.571	7	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.15
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	17	.765	0	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.04
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	6	16	.188	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.75
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	25	.480	3	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.53
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	14	.786	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.58
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.35
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	1	12	.833	7	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.89
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	9	.333	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.78
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	1	17	.824	6	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.48
33	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	20	.800	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	22.0	9.98
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	15	.533	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.72
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	5	20	.450	5	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.59
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	4	17	.353	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.14
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	13	.846	6	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.53
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	1	16	.750	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.77
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.92
Total		85	237	2.79	56	329	.550	82	9	40	0.11	240	.833	.	.	.	.	293.0	7.50

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.08
2	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.10
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.94
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.28
7	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.10
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.23
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.15
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	2	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.04
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.75
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.53
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.58
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.35
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.89
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	3	3	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.78
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.48
33	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	9.98
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.72
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	2	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.59
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.14
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.53
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.77
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.92
Total		85	6	82	88	19	1.04	34	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	293.0	7.50