Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	1	0.67	10	.900	0	0.00	5	.000	2.0	8.31
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.25	14	.786	4	1.00	4	1.000	1.0	4.43
5	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	1	0.25	14	.929	1	0.25	3	.333	1.0	8.25
6	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	12	.917	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	9.11
7	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	8.08
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	5	1.67	8	.625	1.0	3.83
11	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	4	0	1.33	12	1.000	3	1.00	7	.429	4.0	10.00
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	4	1.33	5	.800	2.0	9.02
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	5	1.67	6	.833	0.0	6.91
16	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.40	18	.889	2	0.40	4	.500	2.0	5.58
19	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	5	1.00	8	.625	0.0	6.45
20	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	3.83
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	7.03
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.50	19	.947	4	1.00	6	.667	2.0	6.93
33	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	3	2	1.00	12	.833	3	1.00	8	.375	3.0	5.78
34	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	7	1.40	12	.583	0.0	10.00
38	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	4	0.33	9	.556	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	7.58
39	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	3	0.67	11	.727	3	1.00	7	.429	2.0	7.23
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	12	.833	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	8.85
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	8	.375	1.0	8.65
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	3	1.00	5	.600	2.0	10.00
Total		74	.	.	.	.	.	102	24	32	0.32	247	.870	66	0.89	124	.532	24.0	7.42

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.33	15	1	.933	2.0	8.31
3	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.22	23	1	.957	1.0	4.43
5	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	16	2.24	29	4	.862	1.0	8.25
6	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	11	2.33	21	0	1.000	0.0	9.11
7	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.75	13	2.14	29	2	.931	0.0	8.08
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.06	16	1	.938	1.0	3.83
11	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	4.0	10.00
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	12	2.35	20	1	.950	2.0	9.02
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	4	1.59	17	3	.824	0.0	6.91
16	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	15	1.97	31	7	.774	2.0	5.58
19	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	15	2.19	27	3	.889	0.0	6.45
20	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	17	2.27	30	3	.900	0.0	3.83
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	17	2.18	34	2	.941	0.0	7.03
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	16	2.35	31	1	.968	2.0	6.93
33	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.27	22	2	.909	3.0	5.78
34	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	28	5.60	14	2.48	23	1	.957	0.0	10.00
38	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	4	1.91	11	1	.909	1.0	7.58
39	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	2.31	13	0	1.000	2.0	7.23
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	5	2.08	12	1	.917	0.0	8.85
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	3	2.22	9	0	1.000	1.0	8.65
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	8	2.73	11	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
Total		74	.	.	.	.	.	236	3.19	228	2.22	440	34	.923	24.0	7.42