Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	21	.286	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.62
2	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	30	.233	14	1	2	0.25	22	.909	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.39
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	20	.150	3	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.26
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	27	.407	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.38
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	21	.429	8	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.45
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	6	32	.406	8	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.78
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	24	.417	6	2	4	0.50	14	.714	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.37
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	4	33	.424	6	0	5	0.00	20	.750	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.80
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	20	.000	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.36
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	7	41	.390	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	26.0	8.75
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	21	.524	9	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	14.5	10.00
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	33	.273	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.42
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	12	.417	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.34
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	7	33	.152	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.56
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	26	.385	6	2	1	0.50	15	.933	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.53
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	25	.280	7	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.36
Total		68	210	3.09	69	428	.329	94	12	32	0.18	239	.866	.	.	.	.	240.0	6.78

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.62
2	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.39
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.26
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.38
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.45
12	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.78
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.37
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.80
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.36
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	26.0	8.75
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	10.00
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.42
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.34
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.56
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.53
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.36
Total		68	0	36	36	0	0.53	68	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	240.0	6.78