Players

Easton Bennett 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	15	13	15	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	14	.000	3	2	0	0.50	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.56
2	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	7	31	.226	6	1	5	0.25	17	.706	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.10
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	7	32	.219	15	3	3	0.60	27	.889	.	.	.	.	17.0	5.83
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	14	.143	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.70
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	35	.171	6	1	1	0.25	16	.938	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.5	6.84
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	11	.182	4	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	3.42
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	21	.429	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	5.00
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	28	.143	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.56
17	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	9	21	-.048	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.26
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	16	.563	8	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	13	.462	3	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.95
25	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	27	.370	7	2	6	0.40	21	.714	0	0.00	2	.000	17.5	5.91
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	23	.348	4	2	4	0.40	16	.750	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.86
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	28	.357	5	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.18
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	21	.524	5	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.16
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	21	.381	10	3	3	0.60	19	.842	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.55
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	20	.350	2	1	3	0.25	11	.727	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.66
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	3.70
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	4	1	4	0.25	13	.692	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.93
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	4	1	3	0.33	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	5.40
Total		81	200	2.47	78	419	.291	99	21	49	0.26	279	.824	6	0.07	7	.857	249.0	5.25

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	2	1.50	5	1.25	21	2.22	37	4	.892	8.0	4.56
2	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	18	2.03	38	5	.868	16.5	7.10
5	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	16	2.03	38	3	.921	17.0	5.83
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	13	1.82	34	5	.853	6.5	2.70
8	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	7	1.75	17	2.22	36	4	.889	13.5	6.84
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	4	1.85	13	1	.923	5.0	3.42
13	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	4	1.71	17	0	1.000	13.0	5.00
16	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	25	2.37	41	3	.927	11.5	4.56
17	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	13	2.17	23	3	.870	11.5	6.26
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	15	1.89	38	7	.816	14.5	4.46
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	7	2.33	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	10.5	6.95
25	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	13	2.03	31	2	.935	17.5	5.91
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	20	2.19	36	4	.889	15.0	4.86
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	17	2.20	35	2	.943	16.0	7.18
30	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	17	2.09	35	3	.914	15.0	5.16
35	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	13	2.00	32	4	.875	15.0	4.55
38	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	18	2.14	35	5	.857	14.0	5.66
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.38	21	0	1.000	6.5	3.70
40	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	1.82	39	4	.897	13.0	4.93
45	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	15	2.03	29	5	.828	9.5	5.40
Total		81	1	54	55	7	0.68	92	1.14	295	2.09	625	64	.898	249.0	5.25