Players

Easton Bennett 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	15	13	15	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.16
2	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	18	.278	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.48
4	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	21	.095	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	6.54
6	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	18	.278	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.19
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	18	.111	4	2	3	0.67	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	3.99
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	20	.500	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.58
15	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	8	29	.241	7	2	5	0.50	19	.737	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	8.60
16	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	17	.353	3	1	1	0.20	13	.923	2	0.40	3	.667	13.0	4.65
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	6	38	.421	11	2	3	0.40	24	.875	2	0.40	4	.500	25.0	8.44
20	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.94
21	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	29	.310	2	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.90
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	27	.481	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.40
25	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.0	3.66
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	18	.556	7	3	4	0.75	18	.778	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.86
33	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	13	.308	9	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.58
34	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	6	35	.371	8	0	2	0.00	21	.905	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.05
38	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	17	.412	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.98
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	14	.357	7	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.39
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	18	.167	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.22
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	21	.429	8	2	1	0.67	15	.933	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.53
Total		70	209	2.99	68	401	.352	103	19	38	0.27	276	.862	6	0.09	11	.545	252.0	6.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	14	2.38	21	2	.905	11.0	7.16
2	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.55	11	0	1.000	11.0	7.48
4	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	10	2.50	14	0	1.000	9.0	6.54
6	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	5	1.71	14	2	.857	8.5	3.19
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.95	20	2	.900	9.0	3.99
12	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	7	2.10	21	0	1.000	14.5	7.58
15	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	13	2.50	20	0	1.000	18.5	8.60
16	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	1	0.20	19	2.41	29	1	.966	13.0	4.65
17	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	11	2.20	12	2.18	28	1	.964	25.0	8.44
20	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	1	0.33	13	2.35	23	1	.957	4.5	3.94
21	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	13	2.58	19	0	1.000	15.0	7.90
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	8	2.18	17	2	.882	18.0	7.40
25	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.38	13	1	.923	5.0	3.66
31	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	13	1.60	40	9	.775	18.5	5.86
33	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.11	19	1	.947	8.5	5.58
34	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	21	2.00	41	6	.854	20.5	7.05
38	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	15	2.19	32	2	.938	8.5	4.98
41	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	6	1.94	16	1	.938	10.0	5.39
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	12	2.17	24	1	.958	9.5	6.22
46	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	7	2.18	17	0	1.000	14.5	8.53
Total		70	2	44	46	6	0.66	83	1.19	220	2.16	439	32	.927	252.0	6.21