Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.88
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	5	13	-.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.88
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.69
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	11	.000	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.17
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.36
17	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.23
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	8	.750	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.33
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
25	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	12	.167	2	1	3	0.20	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.13
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	21	.286	5	1	2	0.20	12	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.66
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	18	.278	3	2	4	0.50	12	.667	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.08
34	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	8	.500	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.35
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	10	-.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	1	11	.455	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.66
Total		61	80	1.31	39	177	.232	25	5	14	0.08	84	.833	.	.	.	.	106.5	4.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.88
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.88
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
6	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.69
10	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
14	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.17
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.36
17	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.23
18	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.33
19	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
25	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.13
26	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.66
29	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.08
34	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.35
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.01
44	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.66
Total		61	2	39	41	5	0.67	7	0.11	.	.	.	.	.	106.5	4.21