Players

Camden Patterson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	12	12	12	9	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	13	.308	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.64
5	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	18	.167	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	0	0.00	2	.000	7.0	4.41
6	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	28	.036	5	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.97
8	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	5	32	.250	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.99
9	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	17	.176	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	4.72
10	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	16	.500	11	3	2	0.75	19	.895	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.42
11	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	25	.080	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.61
13	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	7	14	-.286	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	4.5	4.29
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.39
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	9	.444	5	1	4	0.25	12	.667	0	0.00	2	.000	7.0	3.74
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	15	.133	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.30
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	11	.545	9	1	2	0.33	16	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.75
31	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	19	.316	10	0	2	0.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.26
34	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	13	.385	4	1	6	0.25	15	.600	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.06
36	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	16	.250	4	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.29
39	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	18	.389	4	0	2	0.00	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	3.95
41	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	16	.000	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.06
44	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	18	.333	8	1	3	0.20	18	.833	2	0.40	1	2.000	10.5	4.04
Total		68	127	1.87	57	311	.225	77	10	39	0.15	232	.832	8	0.12	8	1.000	153.0	4.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	7.0	5.64
5	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.35	17	0	1.000	7.0	4.41
6	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	19	2.09	35	5	.857	7.5	3.97
8	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	13	2.19	31	1	.968	13.0	4.99
9	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	15	2.38	21	2	.905	6.5	4.72
10	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	19	2.14	37	2	.946	13.0	5.42
11	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	2.64	14	0	1.000	9.0	6.61
13	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	18	2.52	27	0	1.000	4.5	4.29
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	6	2.42	12	0	1.000	9.0	6.39
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	8	2.00	19	2	.895	7.0	3.74
18	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	10	2.44	16	0	1.000	6.5	4.30
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	6	2.00	13	2	.846	8.0	4.75
31	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	6	1.20	24	2.26	39	4	.897	11.5	5.26
34	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	1.81	16	1	.938	7.0	2.06
36	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	24	2.38	40	3	.925	10.0	4.29
39	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	8	1.60	15	1.94	35	5	.857	12.0	3.95
41	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.21	29	0	1.000	4.0	3.06
44	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	18	2.25	36	1	.972	10.5	4.04
Total		68	3	26	29	3	0.43	94	1.38	245	2.23	453	28	.938	153.0	4.55