Players

Brantley Ellis 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	16	15	9	-

Career Honors

S71st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	22	.455	1	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.01
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	6	3	1	1.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.13
3	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	7	17	.176	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.26
4	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	20	.350	7	2	0	0.50	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.42
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	0	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.37
6	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	14	.714	13	1	0	0.25	22	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.76
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	7	16	-.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	16	.313	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.86
15	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	23	.478	3	1	4	0.20	14	.714	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.54
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	17	.529	4	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.16
19	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	3	21	.667	6	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.68
22	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	11	.545	8	0	4	0.00	20	.800	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.97
26	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	13	.308	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
31	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	14	.571	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.88
36	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	5	-.200	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.52
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.70
41	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	14	.357	0	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
46	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	15	.400	11	5	2	1.25	22	.909	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.20
Total		73	178	2.44	61	278	.421	80	16	28	0.22	232	.879	.	.	.	.	227.0	6.61

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.01
2	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.13
3	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.26
4	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.42
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.37
6	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.76
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.32
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.37
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.86
15	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.54
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.16
19	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.68
22	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	2	3	5	1	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.97
26	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.19
31	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.88
36	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.52
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.70
41	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.16
46	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.20
Total		73	4	58	62	12	0.85	20	0.27	.	.	.	.	.	227.0	6.61