Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	22	-.136	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.79
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	6	27	.259	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.26
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	23	.087	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.05
11	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	8	23	-.087	3	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.95
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	13	-.154	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	3.5	3.69
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	22	-.091	0	0	2	0.00	4	.500	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.12
33	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	22	.318	9	0	2	0.00	15	.867	1	0.25	3	.333	13.0	6.29
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.5	3.92
Total		25	54	2.16	40	162	.086	19	2	9	0.08	64	.859	2	0.08	6	.333	63.5	4.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.95	22	3	.864	4.0	2.79
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	7	2.33	13	2.21	24	2	.917	14.5	8.26
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	8	2.67	7	1.86	21	2	.905	7.5	4.05
11	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	3	1.92	13	0	1.000	8.0	3.95
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	6	2.00	9	2.17	18	2	.889	3.5	3.69
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	16	2.36	25	2	.920	4.5	4.12
33	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	7	1.75	10	2.05	21	2	.905	13.0	6.29
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	8	1.70	23	6	.739	8.5	3.92
Total		25	0	15	15	4	0.60	46	1.84	74	2.04	167	19	.886	63.5	4.63