Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	13	4.33	70	.186	0.0	1.52
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	37	12.33	71	.521	1.5	7.10
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	6	2	0	0.67	14	1.000	16	5.33	63	.254	3.5	3.20
11	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	25	8.33	72	.347	1.0	3.71
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	16	5.33	58	.276	0.0	1.08
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	1	0	3	0.00	5	.400	19	6.33	68	.279	1.5	1.90
33	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	15	2	2	0.50	22	.909	40	10.00	82	.488	4.5	6.65
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	28	9.33	54	.519	2.0	4.48
Total		25	5	0.20	4	25	.040	34	5	13	0.20	84	.845	194	7.76	538	.361	14.0	3.71

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.52
4	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.10
7	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.20
11	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.71
14	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.08
17	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	1.90
33	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.65
36	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.48
Total		25	0	8	8	1	0.32	18	0.72	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	3.71