Players

Eduardo Mendoza 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	14	14	13	12	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	8	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.18
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	24	.167	2	0	4	0.00	15	.733	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	4.52
4	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	20	.150	7	1	4	0.20	20	.800	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.55
6	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	13	.308	6	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.17
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.51
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	10	.100	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	5.08
11	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	28	.000	4	0	4	0.00	14	.714	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.0	4.73
13	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	24	.208	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.23
18	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	23	.391	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.90
21	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	14	.286	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	3.56
26	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	10	.400	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	4.62
32	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	16	-.063	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.96
39	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	27	.556	9	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.5	9.20
41	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	6	20	.100	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.39
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	20	.200	11	1	2	0.20	23	.913	2	0.40	1	2.000	7.5	4.47
46	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	18	.167	9	0	3	0.00	21	.857	0	0.00	4	.000	9.0	4.89
Total		62	115	1.85	56	282	.209	89	8	33	0.13	227	.855	11	0.18	10	1.100	147.0	5.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	4	2.29	7	0	1.000	1.5	5.18
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	13	2.65	17	0	1.000	11.0	4.52
4	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	12	2.33	21	1	.952	10.0	4.55
6	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	15	2.44	25	0	1.000	9.5	5.17
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	5	2.44	9	0	1.000	5.5	5.51
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	11	3.67	2	2.00	3	1	.667	6.5	5.08
11	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	1	8	9	0	2.25	5	1.25	14	2.19	27	3	.889	12.0	4.73
13	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	7	3.00	7	0	1.000	11.5	7.23
18	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	2	0.67	9	2.22	18	1	.944	16.0	7.90
21	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	9	2.03	29	0	1.000	5.5	3.56
26	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	18	2.48	25	1	.960	6.5	4.62
32	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	1.90	20	4	.800	5.0	1.96
39	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	10	3.00	10	0	1.000	20.5	9.20
41	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	19	2.40	30	2	.933	9.5	4.39
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	10	2.44	16	0	1.000	7.5	4.47
46	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	13	2.36	22	0	1.000	9.0	4.89
Total		62	3	42	45	0	0.73	80	1.29	168	2.35	286	13	.955	147.0	5.19