Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	5.98
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	5.45
4	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	5	1.000	0.0	4.95
6	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	11	.182	0.0	7.73
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	1	2.000	0.0	9.35
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	.250	0.0	4.85
Total		23	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	18	0.78	34	.529	0.0	6.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.20	15	2	.867	0.0	5.98
3	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	19	2.02	44	4	.909	0.0	5.45
4	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	19	2.05	38	4	.895	0.0	4.95
6	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	12	2.00	26	4	.846	0.0	7.73
7	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.50	14	0	1.000	0.0	9.35
9	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	2.07	15	0	1.000	0.0	4.85
Total		23	.	.	.	.	.	55	2.39	73	2.09	152	14	.908	0.0	6.39