Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	12	28	-.071	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.58
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	20	.450	6	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.42
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	19	.158	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.54
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	8	29	.103	3	2	2	0.50	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.78
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	30	.433	6	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.42
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	22	.364	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.40
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	12	38	.211	4	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	22.0	6.70
41	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	15	.867	10	1	3	0.33	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.54
44	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	1	21	.762	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.18
46	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	28	.429	9	2	5	0.40	23	.783	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.14
Total		36	137	3.81	54	250	.332	50	10	21	0.28	143	.853	.	.	.	.	153.0	6.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.58
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.42
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.54
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.78
15	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.42
17	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.40
39	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	22.0	6.70
41	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.54
44	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.18
46	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.14
Total		36	2	8	10	0	0.28	36	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	153.0	6.57