Players

Ivan Washington 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	14	15	15	8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	0	21	.714	8	1	4	0.25	18	.778	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.82
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	19	.211	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.03
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	6	20	.200	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.84
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	2	0	4	0.00	7	.429	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.34
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	17	.647	5	1	2	0.25	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.95
14	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	25	.480	11	2	5	0.40	24	.792	.	.	.	.	19.5	6.47
15	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	8	1	3	0.33	16	.813	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.21
17	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	4	19	.526	3	0	5	0.00	13	.615	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.01
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	15	.600	3	0	3	0.00	6	.500	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	6.66
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	9	23	.174	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	5.38
23	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	16	.000	3	0	5	0.00	11	.545	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.26
25	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	16	.250	4	0	2	0.00	14	.857	1	0.20	2	.500	8.5	4.14
27	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.96
29	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	21	.190	8	1	1	0.25	15	.933	1	0.25	2	.500	9.5	3.20
31	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	7	.714	3	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.05
34	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	11	.727	4	2	0	0.40	13	1.000	3	0.60	1	3.000	13.0	4.31
36	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	10	.900	4	1	0	0.25	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.24
39	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	15	.600	8	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.12
41	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	21	.429	5	2	0	0.40	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.07
Total		75	186	2.48	55	311	.421	92	15	43	0.20	244	.824	11	0.15	7	1.571	229.0	5.48

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	21	5.25	17	2.68	22	0	1.000	16.5	8.82
5	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.67	21	0	1.000	7.0	5.03
8	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	11	2.20	25	0	1.000	11.5	6.84
10	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	8	2.29	14	1	.929	11.0	7.34
12	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	11	2.00	30	1	.967	15.5	6.95
14	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	2	1.00	4	0.80	12	2.03	31	3	.903	19.5	6.47
15	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	7	2.42	12	1	.917	9.5	7.21
17	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	15	1.85	34	5	.853	16.0	5.01
19	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	9	3.00	7	1.75	20	3	.850	13.0	6.66
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	12	2.40	14	2.15	26	3	.885	13.5	5.38
23	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	16	2.23	31	2	.935	7.5	4.26
25	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	1	0.20	7	1.40	21	2.38	40	0	1.000	8.5	4.14
27	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	1.78	27	5	.815	8.0	2.96
29	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	6	1.89	18	1	.944	9.5	3.20
31	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.07	15	2	.867	6.0	4.05
34	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	23	2.21	38	4	.895	13.0	4.31
36	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	12	2.04	27	2	.926	12.5	5.24
39	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	9	2.25	16	1.86	36	5	.861	16.0	6.12
41	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	12	1.94	32	4	.875	15.0	4.07
Total		75	3	50	53	4	0.71	121	1.61	241	2.11	499	42	.916	229.0	5.48