Players

Career Honors

S62nd All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	10	.400	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	40	10.00	89	.449	5.0	4.62
3	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	5	.400	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	50	12.50	87	.575	4.5	8.08
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	3	-.333	1	0	3	0.00	12	.750	39	9.75	79	.494	1.5	4.16
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	7	0	7	0.00	20	.650	51	10.20	102	.500	4.5	6.22
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	8	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	36	12.00	62	.581	4.0	8.45
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	39	13.00	69	.565	4.5	9.20
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	37	12.33	55	.673	1.5	6.82
16	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	45	15.00	64	.703	1.0	8.75
19	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	0	8	.750	4	1	1	0.20	13	.923	45	9.00	88	.511	8.5	5.04
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	46	11.50	83	.554	2.0	5.52
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	30	10.00	56	.536	2.0	4.88
Total		41	26	0.63	7	51	.373	41	4	17	0.10	129	.868	458	11.17	834	.549	39.0	6.52

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.62
3	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.08
4	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.16
6	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.22
10	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.45
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.20
14	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.82
16	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.75
19	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	2	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.04
20	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.52
29	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.88
Total		41	1	16	17	4	0.41	37	0.90	.	.	.	.	.	39.0	6.52