Players

Bennett Hunter 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	12	16	13	6

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
310 14th	.465 45th	16 136th	84 127th	55 121st

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	23	.348	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.58
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	22	.591	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	2	.000	18.0	7.60
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	29	.517	1	1	1	0.25	9	.889	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.79
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	3	30	.433	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.5	6.99
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	8	48	.271	8	3	1	0.75	17	.941	.	.	.	.	25.5	8.94
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	18	6.00	4	30	.467	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.33	1	1.000	18.0	6.85
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	19	.526	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.04
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	16	.500	5	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	5.01
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	27	.444	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	0	0.00	2	.000	17.5	7.38
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	29	.552	2	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	8.03
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	3	23	.696	6	1	1	0.25	15	.933	2	0.50	1	2.000	21.0	8.39
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	24	6.00	0	35	.686	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	26.0	8.69
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	23	.304	6	3	1	0.75	13	.923	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.88
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.50
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	1	25	.720	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	20.0	5.09
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	4	21	.571	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.37
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	8	29	.241	7	3	2	0.60	17	.882	0	0.00	1	.000	19.0	6.58
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	19	.263	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.61
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	19	.474	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.06
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	27	.407	9	3	2	0.75	18	.889	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.05
Total		75	310	4.13	74	508	.465	71	16	25	0.21	225	.889	14	0.19	10	1.400	354.0	7.12

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	14	2.38	24	0	1.000	13.0	7.58
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	14	2.15	27	3	.889	18.0	7.60
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	17	2.19	32	2	.938	22.0	7.79
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	17	2.00	36	6	.833	17.5	6.99
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	18	2.23	30	3	.900	25.5	8.94
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	1.97	31	4	.871	18.0	6.85
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	9	2.05	20	3	.850	13.5	7.04
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	8	2.00	11	1.90	29	5	.828	12.0	5.01
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.12	25	3	.880	17.5	7.38
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	1	1.60	6	1.20	21	2.39	33	1	.970	23.5	8.03
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	16	2.30	30	1	.967	21.0	8.39
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	14	2.18	28	2	.929	26.0	8.69
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	12	2.27	26	0	1.000	18.0	6.88
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	15	2.38	24	3	.875	8.5	6.50
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	3	0.60	10	1.58	38	10	.737	20.0	5.09
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	10	2.43	21	0	1.000	17.0	8.37
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	12	2.35	26	0	1.000	19.0	6.58
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	9	1.78	23	5	.783	10.5	5.61
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	4	1.64	14	3	.786	13.0	6.06
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	6	1.89	19	2	.895	20.5	7.05
Total		75	1	54	55	5	0.73	84	1.12	253	2.11	536	56	.896	354.0	7.12