Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	3.50
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	5.75
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	6.78
10	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	5	.000	0.0	5.05
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.30
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	.222	0.0	4.40
33	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	10	.200	0.0	3.90
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	8	2.67	11	.727	0.0	10.00
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	19	.842	18	0.72	58	.310	0.0	5.59

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.05	20	3	.850	0.0	3.50
5	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.19	16	2	.875	0.0	5.75
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.39	18	0	1.000	0.0	6.78
10	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	0.0	5.05
13	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.31	13	0	1.000	0.0	5.30
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.05	20	2	.900	0.0	4.40
33	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.22	18	2	.889	0.0	3.90
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	12	2.56	16	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	42	1.68	76	2.27	137	9	.934	0.0	5.59