Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	4.91
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	0	2	0.00	19	.895	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	7.90
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	9.48
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	5	1.25	13	.385	0.0	5.25
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	1	0.25	8	.125	0.0	7.56
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	4	0.67	12	.667	1	0.33	9	.111	2.0	8.00
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	1	0.33	2	.500	1.0	3.65
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.25	16	.875	2	0.50	6	.333	1.0	6.95
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	6.01
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.20	17	.824	3	0.60	5	.600	1.0	5.10
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	15	.867	6	1.50	5	1.200	0.0	5.84
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	4	0.25	13	.692	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	6.05
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	4	0.25	11	.636	2	0.50	7	.286	1.0	5.61
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	6.10
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	2	0.00	19	.895	2	0.40	11	.182	0.0	7.56
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	2	0.33	19	.895	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	8.19
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.20	18	.833	5	1.00	12	.417	1.0	6.83
33	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.25	14	.714	2	0.50	8	.250	1.0	7.31
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	5	1.67	3	1.667	0.0	6.76
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	8.34
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.25	17	.882	4	1.00	13	.308	1.0	6.88
Total		79	.	.	.	.	.	106	11	49	0.14	295	.834	55	0.70	150	.367	11.0	6.68

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	2.00	16	2	.875	0.0	4.91
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	12	2.40	20	0	1.000	0.0	7.90
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	17	4.25	18	2.36	33	1	.970	0.0	9.48
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	14	2.14	29	2	.931	0.0	5.25
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	20	2.24	37	2	.946	0.0	7.56
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	14	4.67	9	1.96	25	1	.960	2.0	8.00
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.19	27	3	.889	1.0	3.65
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	14	2.30	23	2	.913	1.0	6.95
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.64	11	0	1.000	0.0	6.01
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	8	1.90	21	2	.905	1.0	5.10
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	12	2.29	21	1	.952	0.0	5.84
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	9	2.16	19	2	.895	1.0	6.05
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	13	2.53	17	1	.941	1.0	5.61
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.31	16	1	.938	0.0	6.10
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	8	2.23	13	1	.923	0.0	7.56
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.63	8	0	1.000	1.0	8.19
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	11	2.41	17	0	1.000	1.0	6.83
33	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	13	2.33	21	2	.905	1.0	7.31
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.24	25	0	1.000	0.0	6.76
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	11	2.39	18	0	1.000	0.0	8.34
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	23	2.29	38	1	.974	1.0	6.88
Total		79	.	.	.	.	.	181	2.29	252	2.26	455	24	.947	11.0	6.68