Players

Richard Hicks 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	15	12	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	6	-.500	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.85
4	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	10	23	-.217	2	0	6	0.00	13	.538	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.65
11	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	11	1	1	0.33	17	.941	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.03
12	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	9	.000	1	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.90
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	7	0	4	0.00	13	.692	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.50
15	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	10	.000	6	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.48
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	9	-.222	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.82
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
22	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	11	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.71
25	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	4	8	-.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.08
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.00
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	15	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.42
30	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	13	-.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.31
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	13	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
35	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	9	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
40	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	15	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.67
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	9	-.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.88
Total		62	61	0.98	55	186	.032	32	2	17	0.03	86	.802	.	.	.	.	94.5	4.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.85
4	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.65
11	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.03
12	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.90
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.50
15	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	2	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.48
19	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.82
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
22	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.71
25	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	1	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.08
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.00
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.42
30	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.31
34	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
35	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
39	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.97
40	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.67
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.88
Total		62	4	55	59	9	0.95	12	0.19	.	.	.	.	.	94.5	4.55