Players

Richard Hicks 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	15	12	5	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	8	-.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.04
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	17	.294	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.81
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	21	.381	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.86
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	8	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.88
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	10	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.84
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	5	11	-.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	18	-.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.98
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	13	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.76
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	11	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.35
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	9	.444	5	0	5	0.00	14	.643	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.61
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	4	9	.111	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.16
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	3	6	-.333	5	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.09
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	9	.000	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.98
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	16	.063	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	11	.364	8	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.83
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.67
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	14	.357	2	1	2	0.20	11	.818	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.28
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.52
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	8	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.87
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	8	.000	4	2	2	0.50	12	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.90
Total		75	104	1.39	61	227	.189	47	6	25	0.08	127	.803	.	.	.	.	148.5	5.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	6	7	0	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.04
3	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.81
4	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.86
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.88
7	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.84
9	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	1.96
10	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.98
11	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.76
13	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.35
14	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.61
17	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.16
19	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.09
21	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.98
22	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
26	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.83
29	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.67
31	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.28
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.52
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.87
44	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	2	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.90
Total		75	5	67	72	7	0.96	9	0.12	.	.	.	.	.	148.5	5.19