Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	5	.200	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	32	10.67	57	.561	4.5	7.05
4	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	30	10.00	65	.462	1.0	4.16
11	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	3	0.67	19	.842	40	13.33	59	.678	3.5	9.68
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	15	5.00	48	.313	0.0	1.68
18	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	2	1	4	0.20	15	.733	51	10.20	92	.554	3.0	4.82
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	10	2	2	0.40	22	.909	40	8.00	94	.426	4.0	4.30
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	8	0	2	0.00	23	.913	48	9.60	96	.500	4.0	6.13
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	36	12.00	66	.545	2.5	7.26
36	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	9	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	30	10.00	60	.500	1.5	5.63
41	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	10	0	4	0.00	21	.810	45	11.25	77	.584	2.5	7.67
Total		37	9	0.24	3	33	.182	63	6	18	0.16	159	.887	367	9.92	714	.514	26.5	5.84

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.05
4	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.16
11	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.68
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.68
18	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.82
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.30
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.13
29	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.26
36	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.63
41	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.67
Total		37	3	17	20	2	0.54	47	1.27	.	.	.	.	.	26.5	5.84