Players

Jeremy Nichols 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	13	4	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	16	.063	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.57
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	15	.467	4	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.95
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.56
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	13	.692	3	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.81
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	10	-.100	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.78
8	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	12	.167	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.60
13	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.31
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	17	.294	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.90
17	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	7	15	-.133	5	2	3	0.50	13	.769	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.55
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	18	.333	6	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.75
23	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.23
25	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	13	.308	5	2	2	0.40	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.39
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	9	.222	4	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.60
29	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	9	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.55
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	4	2	0	0.67	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.46
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	16	.625	9	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.27
41	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	16	.625	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.58
46	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	11	.818	4	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.55
Total		65	132	2.03	48	224	.375	76	14	23	0.22	211	.891	.	.	.	.	168.5	5.63

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	7.57
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.95
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.56
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.81
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.78
8	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.60
13	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.31
15	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.90
17	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	1	7	8	1	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.55
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.75
23	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.23
25	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.39
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.60
29	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	9.55
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.46
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.27
41	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.58
46	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.55
Total		65	3	39	42	6	0.65	20	0.31	.	.	.	.	.	168.5	5.63