Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	3	-.667	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	29	9.67	76	.382	2.0	6.46
8	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	29	7.25	92	.315	2.0	3.04
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	10	1	1	0.33	17	.941	21	7.00	73	.288	3.5	4.46
13	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	9	1	1	0.20	21	.952	46	9.20	107	.430	2.5	5.11
18	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	6	.000	3	1	6	0.25	16	.625	62	15.50	94	.660	1.5	8.20
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	5	.200	8	1	5	0.20	21	.762	41	8.20	101	.406	5.0	5.01
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	12	1	4	0.33	21	.810	33	11.00	54	.611	2.0	6.53
35	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	5	.400	2	0	4	0.00	16	.750	53	10.60	95	.558	2.0	5.14
40	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	6	0	1	0.00	18	.944	41	10.25	77	.532	2.0	5.68
Total		36	6	0.17	3	38	.079	58	5	24	0.14	155	.845	355	9.86	769	.462	22.5	5.51

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.46
8	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.04
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	1	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.46
13	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.11
18	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.20
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.01
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.53
35	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.14
40	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.68
Total		36	3	17	20	0	0.56	58	1.61	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	5.51