Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	9	1	2	0.25	19	.895	44	11.00	92	.478	8.5	7.29
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	30	10.00	73	.411	3.0	6.63
9	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	46	9.20	99	.465	1.5	3.58
11	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	8	-.250	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	35	8.75	85	.412	3.0	4.72
15	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	8	1	1	0.20	20	.950	59	11.80	105	.562	3.5	7.90
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	7	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	15	5.00	52	.288	3.0	2.52
21	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	26	8.67	61	.426	1.0	3.08
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	6	.000	5	2	2	0.50	14	.857	47	11.75	94	.500	5.0	7.25
30	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	10	.400	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	54	13.50	99	.545	5.5	8.26
Total		35	11	0.31	2	43	.209	48	9	14	0.26	133	.895	356	10.17	760	.468	34.0	5.69

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.29
6	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.63
9	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.58
11	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.72
15	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.90
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.52
21	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.08
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.25
30	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.26
Total		35	2	24	26	1	0.74	33	0.94	.	.	.	.	.	34.0	5.69