Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	11	1	4	0.33	19	.789	41	13.67	82	.500	2.0	9.66
9	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	17	5.67	52	.327	1.5	2.78
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	25	8.33	69	.362	1.5	3.62
15	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	11	5	5	1.00	26	.808	49	9.80	112	.438	7.0	5.77
18	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	6	.333	6	2	2	0.50	18	.889	33	8.25	88	.375	6.0	5.10
Total		18	6	0.33	3	19	.158	32	8	13	0.44	81	.840	165	9.17	403	.409	18.0	5.39

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.66
9	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.78
10	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.62
15	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.77
18	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.10
Total		18	0	8	8	1	0.44	31	1.72	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	5.39