Players

Charlie Burke 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	16	10	-

Season 5 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
221 67th	.528 13th	19 93rd	28 334th	83 21st

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	21	.476	1	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.91
3	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	9	.333	6	1	3	0.25	16	.813	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.27
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.84
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	15	.267	2	2	1	0.50	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.15
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	15	.733	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.72
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.62
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	7	22	.273	10	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.85
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	13	.846	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.79
14	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	0	18	.889	2	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.99
15	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	13	.385	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.49
17	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	6	.333	4	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.98
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.31
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	12	.917	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.19
22	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	19	.368	8	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.92
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.92
26	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	19	.684	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.81
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	4	19	.421	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.34
33	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	7	3	3	1.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.70
34	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	16	.563	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.54
35	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	4	12	.000	9	3	6	0.60	20	.700	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.34
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
40	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	9	.333	6	2	1	0.40	19	.947	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.16
44	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	16	.625	4	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.76
45	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	16	.750	4	2	2	0.50	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.59
Total		88	221	2.51	52	320	.528	107	19	43	0.22	307	.860	.	.	.	.	286.0	6.76

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 5)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	9	9	1	2.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.91
3	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.27
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.84
6	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.15
8	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.72
9	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	8.62
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.85
11	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.79
14	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.99
15	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.49
17	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.98
19	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.31
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.19
22	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	9.92
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.92
26	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.81
30	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	2	3	5	0	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.34
33	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.70
34	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.54
35	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.34
39	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	5	7	0	2.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	10.00
40	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.16
44	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.76
45	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.59
Total		88	9	74	83	8	0.94	28	0.32	.	.	.	.	.	286.0	6.76