Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	3	2	0.75	12	.833	1	0.25	5	.200	3.0	4.50
3	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	4	0.20	13	.692	6	1.20	9	.667	1.0	5.93
5	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	5	1.67	11	.455	0.0	7.43
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.67	11	.818	3	1.00	5	.600	2.0	8.95
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	1	0.33	6	.167	2.0	3.73
17	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	3	0.25	12	.750	5	1.25	7	.714	1.0	8.40
46	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	3	0.60	8	.375	0.0	5.55
Total		27	.	.	.	.	.	26	9	11	0.33	77	.857	24	0.89	51	.471	9.0	6.36

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.03	31	1	.968	3.0	4.50
3	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	2.41	17	0	1.000	1.0	5.93
5	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	10	2.05	19	3	.842	0.0	7.43
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	10	2.33	18	0	1.000	2.0	8.95
10	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	2.06	16	1	.938	2.0	3.73
17	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	2.50	18	0	1.000	1.0	8.40
46	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	18	2.27	33	1	.970	0.0	5.55
Total		27	.	.	.	.	.	54	2.00	77	2.22	152	6	.961	9.0	6.36