Players

Dallas Burton 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	13	9	-

Season 6 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
135 163rd	.238 239th	7 280th	9 425th	63 83rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	12	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.44
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	14	-.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
5	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	5	18	.278	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.06
6	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	7	19	-.105	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.44
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	12	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.63
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	13	.077	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.45
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
13	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	18	.556	8	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.66
14	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	6	10	-.300	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
17	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	5	.600	9	3	2	0.75	18	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.99
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	9	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
22	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	14	-.071	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
23	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	11	.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.72
25	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	17	.706	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.98
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	15	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.13
31	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
33	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	3	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.40
36	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.72
38	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	12	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.54
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	10	.400	6	2	3	0.67	14	.786	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.40
43	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.75
44	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	4	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.73
46	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.31
Total		87	135	1.55	68	282	.238	28	7	12	0.08	72	.833	.	.	.	.	174.0	4.44

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 6)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.44
3	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.60
5	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.06
6	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.62
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.44
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.63
10	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.45
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.19
13	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.66
14	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
17	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.99
19	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.27
22	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.97
23	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.72
25	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.98
26	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.13
31	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
33	Albuquerque W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.40
36	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.72
38	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.54
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.40
43	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.75
44	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.73
46	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.31
Total		87	1	62	63	10	0.72	9	0.10	.	.	.	.	.	174.0	4.44