Players

Cory Mahoney 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	11	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	12	.083	5	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.26
5	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.68
6	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.01
7	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	9	.111	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.30
9	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	12	.000	9	2	1	0.50	22	.955	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.51
11	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	2	9	.222	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.23
12	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	6	16	.000	8	1	4	0.20	20	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.94
14	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	11	.091	7	3	1	1.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.59
15	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	13	-.077	10	1	4	0.25	16	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.17
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	10	.200	7	4	5	1.00	19	.737	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.58
19	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	20	.250	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.40
21	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.34
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	13	.231	6	1	3	0.25	16	.813	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.71
30	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	20	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.63
32	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	17	.059	9	1	2	0.20	20	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.91
44	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	6	20	.050	8	1	1	0.25	17	.941	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.14
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	3	0	5	0.00	11	.545	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.88
Total		65	95	1.46	61	223	.152	94	19	40	0.29	234	.829	.	.	.	.	143.0	5.55

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.26
5	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.68
6	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	1	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	9.01
7	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.30
9	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.51
11	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.23
12	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.94
14	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.59
15	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.17
17	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.58
19	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.40
21	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.34
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.71
30	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.63
32	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.91
44	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	2	1	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.14
45	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.88
Total		65	5	48	53	6	0.82	20	0.31	.	.	.	.	.	143.0	5.55