Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	5.20
5	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	6.78
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	.333	0.0	5.63
9	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	8	.250	0.0	5.65
12	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	5.80
13	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.95
14	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	5.05
17	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	5.48
19	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	1	4.000	0.0	3.60
21	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	5.70
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.88
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.50
26	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	3.55
29	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	8	.250	0.0	7.05
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	9	.111	0.0	7.00
34	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	5	0.20	17	.706	1	0.20	10	.100	1.0	5.85
36	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	13	.846	4	1.00	13	.308	0.0	7.91
39	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	5	1.200	0.0	2.30
41	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	3.60
44	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	4	1.750	0.0	5.50
46	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	7	.571	0.0	3.55
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	7	0.01	30	.767	57	0.70	127	.449	1.0	5.17

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	14	1.97	34	4	.882	0.0	5.20
5	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.10	20	1	.950	0.0	6.78
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	1.75	24	5	.792	0.0	5.63
9	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	13	2.03	29	3	.897	0.0	5.65
12	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	12	2.10	29	2	.931	0.0	5.80
13	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.05	22	1	.955	0.0	2.95
14	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	14	2.06	32	1	.969	0.0	5.05
17	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	15	2.00	30	4	.867	0.0	5.48
19	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	1.84	31	3	.903	0.0	3.60
21	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	18	2.08	37	4	.892	0.0	5.70
22	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.22	23	2	.913	0.0	6.88
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.04	26	4	.846	0.0	3.50
26	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	16	2.22	32	2	.938	0.0	3.55
29	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	19	2.36	33	2	.939	0.0	7.05
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	12	1.86	29	6	.793	0.0	7.00
34	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	15	2.06	36	2	.944	1.0	5.85
36	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	18	2.20	35	3	.914	0.0	7.91
39	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	12	1.74	38	5	.868	0.0	2.30
41	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.16	25	3	.880	0.0	3.60
44	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	26	2.02	55	4	.927	0.0	5.50
46	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	17	2.08	36	5	.861	0.0	3.55
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	162	2.00	298	2.04	656	66	.899	1.0	5.17