Players

Emilio Gallo 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	18	8	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
260 44th	.602 10th	33 29th	23 335th	58 80th

Career Honors

S81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	19	.579	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	20	.550	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.81
4	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	15	.333	10	5	1	1.25	22	.955	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.51
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	18	.333	5	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.94
7	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	12	.583	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.54
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	14	.857	7	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	10.00
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	12	.583	10	3	3	0.60	23	.870	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.14
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	16	.625	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.49
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	12	.500	0	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.33
16	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	10	.400	1	0	4	0.00	11	.636	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.67
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	9	.333	5	1	2	0.20	19	.895	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.14
19	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	14	.000	7	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.39
21	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	14	.857	6	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.07
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	18	.500	2	2	4	0.40	16	.750	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.33
25	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	13	.692	6	3	4	0.75	19	.789	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.02
26	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	11	.818	4	1	4	0.25	16	.750	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.55
31	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	11	.455	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.40
33	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	12	.500	6	1	0	0.25	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.82
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	8	1.000	8	2	1	0.67	14	.929	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.49
36	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	24	6.00	1	28	.821	10	3	1	0.75	20	.950	.	.	.	.	28.0	7.74
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	12	1.000	7	4	0	1.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.19
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	10	.800	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.46
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	15	.667	7	1	1	0.20	20	.950	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.85
46	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	16	.688	6	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.75
Total		90	260	2.89	56	339	.602	123	33	35	0.37	352	.901	.	.	.	.	324.0	6.67

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	4.46
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.81
4	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	6.51
5	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.94
7	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.54
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	10.00
11	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.14
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.49
14	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.33
16	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.67
18	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.14
19	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.39
21	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.07
22	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.33
25	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.02
26	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.55
31	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.40
33	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.82
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.49
36	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	28.0	7.74
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.19
41	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.46
44	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.85
46	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	9.75
Total		90	4	54	58	6	0.64	23	0.26	.	.	.	.	.	324.0	6.67