Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	9	1	2	0.25	19	.895	39	9.75	81	.481	1.0	4.68
2	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	6	.167	7	1	5	0.25	17	.706	49	12.25	88	.557	3.5	7.87
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	6	.500	7	1	6	0.20	21	.714	56	11.20	99	.566	6.0	6.46
Total		13	6	0.46	3	15	.200	23	3	13	0.23	57	.772	144	11.08	268	.537	10.5	6.34

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.68
2	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.87
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.46
Total		13	0	3	3	2	0.23	11	0.85	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.34