Players

Sigge Forsberg 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	15	14	16

Season 9 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,164 1st	62 263rd	33 29th	72 149th	43 182nd

Career Honors

S8Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S9Player of SeasonMVP BIG-81st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	8	2	2	0.67	15	.867	32	10.67	51	.627	3.5	6.56
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	10	3	4	1.00	16	.750	40	13.33	56	.714	7.0	10.00
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	8	3	0	1.00	16	1.000	45	15.00	58	.776	5.0	9.53
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3	2	0.75	21	.905	40	10.00	80	.500	4.0	6.09
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	7	.857	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	59	14.75	83	.711	6.0	8.32
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	4	.750	9	2	2	0.40	24	.917	69	13.80	101	.683	5.5	8.97
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	6	0	2	0.00	20	.900	59	11.80	97	.608	3.5	7.20
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	5	.600	7	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	35	11.67	54	.648	4.5	8.10
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	10	2	2	0.50	21	.905	53	13.25	78	.679	7.0	9.68
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	9	3	3	0.75	22	.864	58	14.50	87	.667	7.5	9.84
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	5	.400	6	1	2	0.25	19	.895	53	13.25	80	.663	5.0	8.18
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	4	2	1	0.50	17	.941	56	14.00	79	.709	6.0	9.06
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	3	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	49	16.33	68	.721	2.5	8.20
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	9	.111	7	2	2	0.40	21	.905	67	13.40	99	.677	5.0	8.20
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	9	.333	6	2	3	0.50	17	.824	55	13.75	87	.632	7.5	9.71
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	3	-.333	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	39	13.00	57	.684	1.0	8.32
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	6	1	1	0.33	16	.938	45	15.00	62	.726	4.5	9.90
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	6	.667	7	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	54	13.50	72	.750	7.0	9.03
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	0	9	.556	9	2	2	0.50	21	.905	55	13.75	72	.764	7.0	9.02
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	6	1.000	3	0	3	0.00	13	.769	39	13.00	50	.780	6.5	8.08
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	4	.750	4	0	2	0.00	16	.875	51	12.75	82	.622	3.5	7.48
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	9	-.111	7	0	2	0.00	20	.900	61	12.20	90	.678	0.5	6.70
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	0	8	.750	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	50	12.50	71	.704	9.0	7.86
Total		88	62	0.70	7	113	.487	152	33	40	0.38	403	.901	1164	13.23	1714	.679	118.5	8.44

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.56
5	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	10.00
7	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.53
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.09
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	8.32
12	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.97
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.20
16	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.10
19	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.68
20	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.84
23	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.18
24	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.06
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.20
26	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.20
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.71
32	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.32
34	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.90
37	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.03
39	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.02
42	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.08
44	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.48
46	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	6.70
47	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.86
Total		88	4	39	43	6	0.49	72	0.82	.	.	.	.	.	118.5	8.44