Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	7	.000	5	0	4	0.00	12	.667	26	8.67	73	.356	1.0	4.34
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	8	.000	9	0	0	0.00	15	1.000	26	8.67	63	.413	1.0	5.09
9	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	37	9.25	79	.468	1.5	4.00
10	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	22	7.33	54	.407	1.5	2.78
13	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	3	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	35	11.67	62	.565	3.0	7.38
14	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	4	-.500	5	1	2	0.33	9	.778	42	14.00	80	.525	4.5	9.59
17	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	6	.000	5	3	3	1.00	11	.727	24	8.00	62	.387	4.5	4.18
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	27	9.00	62	.435	2.0	4.51
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	4	.000	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	55	13.75	99	.556	2.5	9.12
23	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	32	10.67	57	.561	3.5	5.60
31	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	4	-.250	4	1	1	0.25	13	.923	57	14.25	90	.633	2.5	8.42
33	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	7	0	1	0.00	11	.909	37	12.33	64	.578	2.0	8.59
36	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	8	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	40	13.33	54	.741	2.0	9.39
38	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	6	.333	4	2	2	0.50	12	.833	48	12.00	83	.578	5.0	7.20
41	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	5	.200	5	2	5	0.40	16	.688	64	12.80	102	.627	5.5	8.21
43	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	11	1	1	0.25	19	.947	55	13.75	82	.671	1.5	8.72
46	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	47	15.67	72	.653	2.0	8.75
48	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	38	12.67	62	.613	2.5	7.82
Total		61	14	0.23	8	77	.078	80	14	31	0.23	206	.850	712	11.67	1300	.548	48.0	6.87

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.34
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.09
9	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.00
10	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.78
13	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.38
14	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	1	5	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.59
17	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.18
18	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.51
22	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	10	2.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.12
23	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.60
31	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.42
33	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.59
36	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	9.39
38	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.20
41	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.21
43	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.72
46	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.75
48	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.82
Total		61	4	32	36	6	0.59	77	1.26	.	.	.	.	.	48.0	6.87