Players

Manuel Peralta 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	16	11	16	9	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	15	.333	8	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.87
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	21	.429	9	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.60
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.59
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	25	.480	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	6.74
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	6	18	.222	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	1	0.33	3	.333	11.0	5.86
8	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	6	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.66
9	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	5	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.72
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	24	.333	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	6.13
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	27	.407	2	0	5	0.00	15	.667	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.00
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	17	.235	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	2	.500	8.0	5.47
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	13	.615	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.04
22	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.57
25	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	14	.429	4	1	1	0.20	14	.929	0	0.00	2	.000	10.0	4.27
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	20	.550	3	1	3	0.25	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	6.53
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	18	.667	3	1	1	0.33	8	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	15.5	7.76
39	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	24	4.80	6	35	.514	6	1	4	0.20	19	.789	1	0.20	2	.500	25.5	7.39
46	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	18	.722	5	1	4	0.33	12	.667	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.49
Total		61	189	3.10	43	312	.468	77	11	41	0.18	212	.807	6	0.10	13	.462	219.5	6.33

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	13	2.52	21	1	.952	10.5	6.87
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	2	0.75	8	2.00	14	2.32	22	1	.955	14.0	7.60
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	1.94	17	2	.882	9.0	5.59
5	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	14	2.03	33	3	.909	17.5	6.74
7	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.10	30	4	.867	11.0	5.86
8	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	6	2.22	18	0	1.000	9.5	6.66
9	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	8	2.00	14	2.13	31	3	.903	12.0	5.72
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	2.00	9	1	.889	12.0	6.13
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	10	2.00	19	2.31	35	2	.943	18.0	7.00
19	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	11	2.23	22	0	1.000	8.0	5.47
21	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	16	2.18	28	2	.929	9.5	6.04
22	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	17	2.28	29	2	.931	5.0	3.57
25	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	17	2.33	36	0	1.000	10.0	4.27
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	10	2.10	21	1	.952	16.0	6.53
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	6	2.00	14	2	.857	15.5	7.76
39	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	9	2.05	21	2	.905	25.5	7.39
46	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	4	2.13	8	1	.875	16.5	8.49
Total		61	2	35	37	5	0.61	80	1.31	196	2.19	395	27	.932	219.5	6.33