Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	29	.241	4	2	2	0.50	13	.846	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.58
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.78
11	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	7	24	-.083	3	1	0	0.25	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.20
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	15	.067	9	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.19
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	6	.500	7	1	4	0.33	14	.714	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.00
18	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	25	.160	5	1	0	0.20	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.69
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	6	20	.000	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.44
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	16	.125	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.43
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	8	.750	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.94
Total		33	59	1.79	35	149	.161	36	6	13	0.18	108	.880	.	.	.	.	72.5	5.03

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.58
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.78
11	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.20
14	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.19
15	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.00
18	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.69
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.44
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.43
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.94
Total		33	3	9	12	2	0.36	34	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	72.5	5.03