Players

Kurt Walter 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	19	.263	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.06
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	8	.125	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.95
4	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	16	.688	6	1	4	0.20	15	.733	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.12
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	5	9	-.556	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.48
8	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	15	.200	6	1	3	0.25	15	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.19
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	3	11	.273	5	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.01
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	20	.400	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.68
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	9	.333	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.07
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	8	.375	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	7	.000	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.67
17	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	18	.389	8	0	1	0.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.24
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	4	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	8	.000	3	2	1	0.50	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.27
30	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.87
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	14	.571	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
40	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	13	.154	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	6	.833	3	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.22
Total		61	104	1.70	43	200	.305	53	10	26	0.16	179	.855	.	.	.	.	142.5	5.60

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.06
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.95
4	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.12
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.48
8	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.19
9	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.01
10	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.68
12	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.07
14	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.28
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.67
17	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	2	1.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.24
19	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.27
30	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.87
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
40	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.75
44	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.22
Total		61	4	49	53	6	0.87	14	0.23	.	.	.	.	.	142.5	5.60