Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.95
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	6.33
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	9.31
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.30
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	4.05
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	6.61
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	11	.545	0.0	6.35
21	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	5.80
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	8.30
29	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	1	0.25	8	.125	0.0	4.13
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	3	0.00	27	.889	29	0.83	60	.483	0.0	6.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	1.68	22	5	.773	0.0	3.95
7	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.17	18	2	.889	0.0	6.33
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.62	13	0	1.000	0.0	9.31
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.00	13	3	.769	0.0	5.30
15	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	2.30	10	0	1.000	0.0	4.05
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.14	14	1	.929	0.0	6.61
18	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	16	2.31	26	1	.962	0.0	6.35
21	Santa Clara W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	11	1.97	29	2	.931	0.0	5.80
26	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	10	2.16	19	1	.947	0.0	8.30
29	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	2.00	28	4	.857	0.0	4.13
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	80	2.29	97	2.10	192	19	.901	0.0	6.01