Players

Miguel Alvarez 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	14	16	17

Season 9 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,151 2nd	38 302nd	41 5th	95 61st	52 118th

Career Honors

S71st All-BIG-EAST

S8MVP BIG-EAST2nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S9MVP BIG-EAST2nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	21	3	2	1.00	25	.920	30	10.00	46	.652	5.0	6.95
3	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	3	-.667	13	0	0	0.00	20	1.000	41	13.67	66	.621	2.5	10.00
5	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	3	.667	20	8	2	1.60	32	.938	65	13.00	102	.637	11.0	8.87
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	10	3	1	1.00	19	.947	34	11.33	60	.567	4.0	7.28
8	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	5	0	4	0.00	16	.750	58	14.50	81	.716	2.0	8.52
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	43	14.33	61	.705	0.5	8.28
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	3	.667	4	2	5	0.40	18	.722	65	13.00	96	.677	5.0	8.32
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	9	0	1	0.00	16	.938	42	14.00	60	.700	4.0	10.00
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	3	.667	8	0	3	0.00	18	.833	52	13.00	63	.825	4.5	9.75
16	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	8	1	0	0.33	17	1.000	48	16.00	67	.716	1.5	9.12
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	43	14.33	55	.782	2.0	8.71
20	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	9	1	2	0.25	21	.905	61	15.25	81	.753	2.5	8.76
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	7	.571	4	1	2	0.20	17	.882	63	12.60	95	.663	5.5	7.44
24	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	0	9	.556	6	2	2	0.40	18	.889	63	12.60	92	.685	9.5	8.76
27	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	38	12.67	48	.792	5.0	8.91
28	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	28	9.33	55	.509	3.0	4.60
30	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	7	2	2	0.67	15	.867	44	14.67	64	.688	5.0	10.00
32	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	3	.667	11	3	2	0.60	25	.920	60	12.00	90	.667	6.5	7.81
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	12	6	3	2.00	20	.850	35	11.67	53	.660	10.5	8.36
35	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	9	1	1	0.33	16	.938	41	13.67	51	.804	2.0	8.73
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	8	.000	9	1	2	0.33	18	.889	34	11.33	47	.723	3.5	8.19
40	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	6	0	1	0.00	18	.944	66	16.50	93	.710	1.5	8.68
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	8	.500	7	2	2	0.40	23	.913	58	11.60	86	.674	7.5	7.04
45	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	2	1.00	15	.867	39	13.00	57	.684	3.5	7.96
Total		88	38	0.43	5	83	.398	198	41	43	0.47	430	.900	1151	13.08	1669	.690	107.5	8.38

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.95
3	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	10.00
5	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.87
6	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.28
8	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.52
9	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	8.28
10	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.32
12	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	10.00
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.75
16	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	9.12
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.71
20	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.76
22	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.44
24	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	8.76
27	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.91
28	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.60
30	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	10.00
32	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.81
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.36
35	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.73
39	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.19
40	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.68
44	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.04
45	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.96
Total		88	5	47	52	0	0.59	95	1.08	.	.	.	.	.	107.5	8.38